This short blog is written on the supposed ‘trans-day of vengeance’ that did not materialize due to massive pushback from the general public – mainly due to the recent tragedy in Nashville, where a mentally-ill transgender individual murdered 6 people, including 3 children. However, this hasn’t stopped mainstream media corporations like ABC to publish benevolent stories about the trans-day of vengeance in the aftermath of the school shooting. Are you surprised, even the Mirror UK attempted a puff piece on the shooter herself. You would be right in saying that not all trans individuals would shoot up a school, but the timing of this seems odd to say the least.
Personally, I am tired of the back and forth. Live and let live is my motto, if you want to wear a dress and get surgery on yourself as an adult, go right ahead – the problem comes down to how this is demonstrated in our vulnerable communities, such as with children and autistic individuals for example. With that said, I think a different approach needs to be understood about this trans phenomenon in society – so much so, that it may not be a phenomenon at all, but an active plan promoted by powerful individuals (tinfoil hat time).
Perhaps it is not as “tinfoil hat” as one would seem. I mean, a simple Google search finds that the LGBTQ+ initiative is found in United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDG) documents (here and here) as a significant objective in the international push for these policies to become real. The UNSDG, and the UN as a whole, have outright levied for gender equity policies on member states for over a decade now. Note they call for equity and not equality, as in, kneecapping others in the pursuit of outcomes-based fairness (equity), compared to providing equal opportunities for every gender to thrive based on their own output (equality). One is forced equality (equity), the other is fair equality (real equality). Linguistic tangent aside, the UNSDG is impactful given that national policy can be influenced by the United Nations, and has been for many years, toward goals that are for the good of UN stakeholders (i.e., other NGOs, corporations, and national government centers).
This had me thinking, is it that this transgenderism phenomenon is solely a social topic? Not necessarily, it is also an economic topic. The ABC tweet had me thinking: what is the big money behind this transgender push? This creates what is called the Transgender Industrial Complex (TIC).
Have you ever wondered why Joe Biden, probably the biggest corporate Democrat since Barack Obama, is pushing transgender ideology? Of course, Joe would say that he has always supported gay marriage (through conversation with his dad in 1960s Wilmington, Delaware, which is totally believable), but we have video evidence on the contrary, as he really did not care about gay marriage and voted against bills as a senator in 2005.
It makes you think, what was the change of heart by the President, and why is he so forceful in his defense of LGBTQ+ rights, especially trans-rights? When looking at the Democratic party (and the Republican party) financers on Wall Street and Corporate America, they all support the transgender ideology. Of course, challenges finding unbiased information were present considering the institutional capture of corporate search engines and social media sites – similar to finding information on the potential negatives of immigration. One article stood out by Jennifer Bilek (@bjportraits) outlining the massive amounts of philanthropic capital being dished out in the name of transgender ideology. Stemming from the Arcus Foundation, who is a philanthropic subsidiary of the medical instrument giant: Stryker Corporation, has a significant history of pushing this ideology in the United States and the world. In addition, the NoVo foundation started by Peter Buffett (son of Warren Buffett), and the Open Society Foundation (which was founded by a man’s name we cannot say 3 times in a mirror, lest you be called an antisemite) have a significant stake in corporatizing the transgender ideology in relation to UNSDGs.
She made connections between these not-for-profit organizations and the push for transgender reform, not only in the United States, but through much of the western world. From the influence of Rhonda Stryker (board fellow at Harvard Medical School), Pat Stryker (forceful advocate for policy change in Colorado), and Michael O’Flaherty (UNHRC elected member since 2004); these individuals helped craft policy and change laws through donations, campaign finance, and other philanthropic action in nations such as Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan. Furthermore, the Arcus Foundation have given billions of dollars to support not-for-profit government organizations such as the Center for American Progress, the ACLU, Human Rights Watch, and The Council for Global Equality.
Another report by James Kirkup in The Spectator found that big money connections to trans advocacy, and policies to push the removal of parental consent for trans children is also backed by big corporate money. This was in a report issued by the Dentons Law Firm, in connection with the Thompson Reuters Media conglomerate, that reflect massive support for gender identity politics and reforming laws for child autonomy against parents. The words of the report state “It is recognised that the requirement for parental consent or the consent of a legal guardian can be restrictive and problematic for minors”, reflecting a push for gender-affirmative care in hospitals without the consent of the parent for these surgeries.
Returning to Arcus, It is not only through these NFPs where they levy power, Arcus has also been shown to engage in DC lobbying and congressional campaign funds. As stated, Arcus is connected to Stryker and the massive pharmaceutical lobby. This presents an even more pernicious concept as Stryker sells medical instruments to many hospitals who perform “trans-affirming care” on minor patients. Furthermore, they have connections through investment firms like BlackRock and Vanguard, who associate with AbbVie Pharmaceuticals – makers of the drug Lupron, used for high powered hormone therapy to halt puberty in children, and has caused prostate/uterine cancer in its users.
One of the problems I have with this, and many others have this same problem, is the push to have children involved with this gender-affirming care through the use of life-altering drugs. To think that under the guise of supposed help, comes a profit motive to push these drugs at the behest of children, make the trans ideology especially malevolent – insofar that it is not about the goals of “equity for genders”, but a pernicious profit motive to benefit the big coffers of the pharmaceutical industry and Wall Street. Not only is the trans lobby emboldened by state and national political figures, but it’s also promoted by powerful financial centers given the massive funding it has obtained over the years. So too, we circle-back to ABC promoting this narrative is not about a social issue, it is about an economic issue given the amount of capital investment the TIC has earned over the past 20 years. Think next time when someone suggests a phrase like the “trans-lobby” that this is actualized with serious social, corporate, and legislative power.
carsonbabich.com 
Excellent blog. I am not a tinfoil hat type myself, but have found myself wondering whether the promotion of the trans-agenda is part of the effort to stem population growth
LikeLike
Thank you Sharon, I think you will find this video interesting.
LikeLike